Dov Zakheim and the 9/11 Conspiracy
By ‘Shadow’ and ‘Pax’ – Conspiracynewsnet
In a document called "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces
and Resources for a New Century" published by The American Enterprise's
"Project for a New American Century"(1), System Planning Corporation
(SPC) International executive, Dov Zakheim, called for "some
catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor" being
necessary to foster the frame of mind needed for the American public to
support a war in the Middle East that would politically and culturally
reshape the region. A respected and established voice in the
intelligence community, his views were eagerly accepted, and Dov went
from his position at Systems Planning Corporation to become the
Comptroller of the Pentagon in May 2001. (2) Perhaps not so
coincidentally, it was an SPC subsidiary, TRIDATA CORPORATION, that
oversaw the investigation after the terrorist attack on the World Trade
Center in 1993.
SPC, according to their official website, specializes in many areas
of defense technology production and manufacture, including a system
developed by their Radar Physics Group called the Flight Termination
System, or FTS.(3) This is a system used to destroy target drones
(craft that would be fired on by test aircraft or weaponry) in the
event of malfunction or "misses". This highly sophisticated war-game
technology allows the control of several 'drones' from a remote
location, on varying frequencies, and has a range of several hundred
miles. This technology can be used on many different types of aircraft,
including large passenger jets.
According to the SPC website (4), a recent customer at that time
was Eglin AFB, located in Florida. Eglin is very near another Air Force
base in Florida-MacDill AFB, where Dov Zakheim contracted to send at
least 32 Boeing 767 aircraft, as part of the Boeing /Pentagon tanker
lease agreement.(5)
As the events of September 11, 2001 occurred, little was mentioned
about these strange connections, and the possible motives and proximity
of Dov Zakheim and his group. Since there was little physical evidence
remaining after the events, investigators were left only with
photographic and anecdotal evidence.
This is a photograph of the Flight Termination System module, from
their site.(5). Note it has a cylindrical shape, and is consistent with
the size and shape of the object observed under the fuselage of flight
175.
The Boeing lease deal involved the replacement of the aging KC-135
tanker fleet with these smaller, more efficient Boeing 767s that were
to be leased by Dov Zakheim's group. The planes were to be refitted
with refueling equipment, including lines and nozzle assemblies.
In this enlargement of flight 175, we can clearly see a cylindrical
object under the fuselage, and a structure that appears to be attached
to the right underside of the rear fuselage section.
When seen in comparison, it is obvious that the plane approaching
the Trade Center has both of these structures-the FTS module and the
midair refueling equipment, as configured on the modified Boeing 767
tankers. Of particular interest is the long tube-like anomalous
structure under the rear fuselage area of flight 175-this structure
runs along the right rear bottom of the plane, as it also does on the
Boeing 767 refueling tanker pictured.
After considering this information, I am convinced that flight 175,
as pictured on the news media and official reports, was in fact a
refitted Boeing 767 tanker, with a Flight Termination System attached.
Use of this system would also explain the expert handling of aircraft
observed in both New York and Washington investigations, which has been
officially credited to inexperienced flight school students.
Since the refitted 767s were able to carry both passengers and a
fuel load, as shown in this photo, it is likely that the plane
designated Flight 175 was in fact a refitted 767 tanker, disguised as a
conventional civilian passenger plane.
As shown in this photo of a 767 being serviced, the FTS unit, when
in position, would be small and unobtrusive enough to be fairly
innocuous (at least to casual observers, such as passengers). The
smallest circle indicates the size and position of the anomaly depicted
in the photos of Flight 175. The larger circle, which is the size of
the engine housing, shows the size of the anomaly in relation to the
engine. Note the size and position of the open hatches on the engine
housing, which would tend to discredit the widely held theory that the
anomaly is an open hatch or cargo door.
As the above diagram shows, all flights involved in the events
traveled very near many military installations, and appear to have
traveled in a manner suggesting guidance and possible transfer of the
control of the planes among the bases.
Since the evidence from the World Trade Center site was quickly
removed, there is little concrete evidence of the involvement of Dov
Zakheim, who has since left his position at the Pentagon. However, the
proximity of Eglin AFB to MacDill AFB in Florida and Dov Zakheim's work
via SPC contracts and the Pentagon leasing agreement on both of these
installations, combined with SPC's access to World Trade Center
structural and security information from their Tridata investigation in
1993, is highly suspicious. Considering his access to Boeing 767
tankers, remote control flight systems, and his published views in the
PNAC document, it seems very likely he is in fact a key figure in the
alleged terrorist attacks in New York City on September 11, 2001.
1. www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
2. www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/20010212-2.html
3. www.sysplan.com/Radar
4. www.sysplan.comRadar/Downloads/FTS.pdf
5. www.afa.org/magazine/aug2003/0803world.asp#anchor5
EDITORIAL RESPONSE TO READERS' COMMENTS:
In response to some of our readers who have questioned our premise
that it was Rabbi Dov Zakheim who 'called for' the Pearl Harbor type of
incident, we here at Conspiracy News Net acknowledge that the PNAC
document was written by the likes of William Kristol and Donald Kagan,
and therefore as the real brains behind the agenda they are the ones
calling for it in a literal sense. However, we do stand by our
assertion that the Rabbi called for it as well, insofar that he signed
his name onto this document. If he signed it he agrees with it and
therefore he is calling for it.
Some of you have argued that we are singling out Rabbi Zakheim because
he is Jewish, implying that we are pushing some sort of twisted
anti-semetic agenda while noting that he is not the only one who signed
the PNAC document and therefore wondering why our article is about him
and not the others. We do not mean to imply that the Rabbi acted alone,
our article simply points out that Rabbi Zakheim had access to things
like structural integrity, blueprints and any number of important
facets of information about the WTC through his work with TRIDATA
CORPORATION in the investgation of the bombing of the WTC in 1993. That
he had access to REMOTE CONTROL Technology through his work at System
Planning Corporation (SPC). That he had access to BOEING AIRCRAFT
through a lease deal HE BROKERED while working at the Pentagon. And
finally that he was part of a group of politically radical Straussian
Neo-Conservatives, who, through their association with PNAC, called for
restructuring of the Middle East, noting that a Pearl Harbor type of
event MAY BE NEEDED to foster the frame of mind required for the
American public to accept such a radical foreign policy agenda. In
light of all this information we here at Conspiracy News Net stand by
our statement that Mr. Zakheim not only called for the slamming of the
WTC Towers on 9-11, but he activily took part in their demolition by
providing the logistics necessary for such an attack to occur.
www.conspiracynewsnet.com/shadow.html
Also see:
The Mastermind Behind 911?
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=1927
Talmudic Rabbi's Hidden Role
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?id=2776
Electronically Hijacking the WTC Attack Aircraft
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=206
